Interactive FMP · Living Facilities Intelligence
One living picture of your facilities program
K12CG connects facility assessments, conditions, deficiencies, work orders, project priorities, costs, funding, capital projects and ongoing updates into one district-owned facilities picture. The value is the connected information and the decision process behind it, not the dashboard software.
District summary
Demonstration DataFictional district. Every school, project, work order, deficiency, cost and funding source below is invented to show how the Interactive FMP works. No client data is shown.
- Sites
- 28
- Students
- 15,998
- 15-year need
- $184M
- 0-5 year need
- $62M
Deferred maintenance by horizon
Find my school
Campus deep dive
Alder Creek Elementary
- Students
- 347
- Built
- 1980
- Replacement value
- $17M
- FCI (0-5 yr)
- 5.9%Fair
Need by building system
| System | Now | 1 yr | 2-5 yr | 6-10 yr | 11-15 yr | WOs | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roofing | $0M | $0M | $0M | $0.1M | $0.2M | 0 | $0.4M |
| HVAC | $0M | $0.1M | $0M | $0.2M | $0.1M | 5 | $0.5M |
| Electrical / Plumbing | $0M | $0M | $0M | $0.1M | $0.2M | 1 | $0.4M |
| Envelope / Fire-Life Safety | $0.1M | $0M | $0M | $0.1M | $0.2M | 1 | $0.4M |
| Accessibility | $0.1M | $0M | $0M | $0.2M | $0.2M | 4 | $0.4M |
| Flooring / Interiors | $0M | $0M | $0M | $0.2M | $0M | 3 | $0.3M |
| Site / Paving / Drainage | $0M | $0M | $0M | $0.2M | $0.2M | 1 | $0.5M |
| Playgrounds / Athletics | $0M | $0M | $0.1M | $0.2M | $0.2M | 4 | $0.5M |
| Technology / Low Voltage | $0.1M | $0.1M | $0.1M | $0.1M | $0.1M | 4 | $0.4M |
Total: $3.6M · Demonstration Data
Schools ranked by FCI
- 110.6%
- 210.3%
- 39.9%
- 49.8%
- 59.5%
- 68.8%
- 78.7%
- 88.7%
- 98.6%
- 107.8%
Project priorities, budget, schedule and funding
Mark a project complete to see how closeout updates the facility profile: the resolved deficiencies leave the backlog, the school’s FCI improves and the rankings refresh.
Open 0-5 year backlog
$62M
| Rank | Project | Budget | Window | Funding | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Roofing renewal | $0.3M | Summer 2027 | Local bond (fictional Measure A) | |
| 2 | Site / Paving / Drainage renewal | $0.3M | Summer 2027 | State funding (eligibility to confirm) | |
| 3 | Site / Paving / Drainage renewal | $0.4M | Winter break 2027 | Deferred maintenance fund | |
| 4 | Roofing renewal | $0.4M | Summer 2028 | Local bond (fictional Measure A) | |
| 5 | Electrical / Plumbing renewal | $0.8M | Summer 2028 | Local bond (fictional Measure A) | |
| 6 | Technology / Low Voltage renewal | $0.2M | Spring break 2029 | State funding (eligibility to confirm) | |
| 7 | Envelope / Fire-Life Safety renewal | $0.2M | Summer 2029 | Deferred maintenance fund | |
| 8 | Site / Paving / Drainage renewal | $0.5M | Summer 2029 | Local bond (fictional Measure A) |
See what this could look like for your district.
We’ll walk through how your existing assessments, projects and funding could come together in one living plan, using your questions, not a sales script.
Modules
Everything in one place, drill-down ready
District → School → Building / System → Deficiency / Project. Every number traces back to the source.
District Summary
Portfolio-wide need, FCI and enrollment at a glance.
Find My School
Search or map any site and jump straight to its data.
Campus Deep Dive
Buildings, systems, photos and deficiencies for each campus.
Facility Condition Index
Consistent FCI by site and building, with bands explained.
Deferred Maintenance 0/1/5/10/15
Need forecast across five planning horizons.
Priorities
Weighted, transparent project rankings.
Funding
Local bond, state program and other sources mapped to projects.
Budget & Schedule
Project budgets, phasing and cash flow.
Work Orders
Maintenance activity linked to the systems and capital needs it affects.
Documents
Reports, drawings and board items in one library.
Ongoing Updates
New assessments and completed projects become part of the facility profile.
Integration-Capable
Can connect to district ERP, CMMS or GIS data where configured. No specific connection is assumed.
Built for your district. Owned by your district.
The data stays with the district. When the engagement ends, the plan stays with you, and your team can keep it current as projects finish and conditions change. Technology keeps the information organized; experienced facilities professionals make the judgments behind it.
Give us 10 minutes. Let’s compare approaches.
Tell us where your facilities stand and what your board is asking. We’ll share how districts like yours are approaching it. No pitch deck, no obligation.