Skip to content

Flagship service · Facilities Master Planning

Facilities master plans that keep working

K12 Consulting Group helps California school districts assess, plan, prioritize, fund and deliver facilities investments. Our master plans bring condition, enrollment, educational adequacy and funding into one districtwide picture. And the data keeps serving the district after the report is complete.

High school site plan with athletic fields, a floor plan, a scale ruler and a planning binder laid out on a table for facilities master plan review

Most master plans are out of date the day they are adopted

Districts spend months building a master plan. Then it goes on a shelf. Enrollment shifts, systems fail, costs rise and the board is asked to make decisions the plan no longer supports.

A useful plan does more than list needs. It connects the condition of every building to enrollment, program needs and available funding. It shows what to do first, what it will cost and how to pay for it.

K12CG builds master plans on editable, district-owned data. When conditions change, the plan changes with them. That keeps the board, staff and community working from the same current information.

The FMP lifecycle

Not a static report. A plan that runs the program.

A K12CG master plan follows the work from the first site walk to the last closeout, and back again when conditions change.

  1. 01

    Assess

    Districtwide condition, capacity and functionality data.

  2. 02

    Prioritize

    Transparent, board-approved criteria rank the projects.

  3. 03

    Fund

    Projects are matched to local, state and other sources.

  4. 04

    Procure

    Scopes and delivery paths are set before work reaches the field.

  5. 05

    Deliver

    Owner-side management through design, construction and closeout.

  6. 06

    Update

    Completed work and new findings refresh the plan.

What the plan connects

Every factor a board weighs, in one districtwide picture

  • Districtwide facilities condition assessment
  • Educational adequacy and functionality
  • Enrollment and capacity
  • Safety and security
  • Accessibility
  • Site circulation
  • Shade and livability
  • Cost estimating
  • Prioritization
  • Funding alignment
  • Implementation planning

Planning views

Deferred maintenance and capital needs by when they come due

Needs are sorted into five horizons so the district can separate urgent repairs from long-range capital planning and budget each year realistically.

  1. 0

    Immediate

    Life-safety, failures and conditions that cannot wait.

  2. 1

    1 year

    Work for the next budget cycle and summer window.

  3. 5

    5 years

    Near-term capital projects and bond or state funding candidates.

  4. 10

    10 years

    Systems reaching end of life that need planned replacement.

  5. 15

    15 years

    Long-range needs that shape reserves and future programs.

Editable and updateable

When work is finished, the backlog shows it

The final plan is delivered as district-owned, editable data. As projects close out and new assessments come in, the facility profile is updated, so resolved deficiencies no longer sit in the backlog and priorities reflect today’s conditions.

  1. New assessment

    Findings are added to the site’s facility profile.

  2. Project completed

    Closeout records the scope that was actually delivered.

  3. Deficiencies resolved

    Corrected items leave the deferred maintenance backlog.

  4. Priorities refresh

    Needs, costs and rankings reflect current conditions.

Technology organizes the planning information and keeps it usable. The judgment behind every score, cost and priority comes from experienced facilities professionals.

See the plan as Living Facilities Intelligence

Explore the Interactive FMP with a fictional district: executive summary, campus deep dives, system filters, priorities and funding.

Explore the Interactive FMP

Scope

What’s included

Districtwide inventory and baseline

A complete record of sites, buildings, square footage, ages and uses. One baseline every later decision can rely on.

Facilities Condition Assessment integration

Asset-level condition data, remaining useful life and FCI scores feed directly into the plan, so priorities rest on observed conditions.

Enrollment, capacity and utilization

We compare projected enrollment with classroom capacity and current use by site. That shows where space is short, where it is idle and where boundaries or programs may need to shift.

Educational adequacy and functionality

Buildings can be in good repair and still fail today’s programs. We evaluate how well spaces support instruction, specialized programs, safety and accessibility.

Project development and prioritization

Needs are grouped into defined projects with scope, planning-level budgets and clear, board-approved criteria for ranking them.

15-year deferred maintenance and capital forecast

A year-by-year view of what will need attention, and when, across immediate, 1-, 5-, 10- and 15-year horizons.

Funding strategy and Prop 2 alignment

We align projects with local bonds, developer fees, deferred maintenance funds and state programs, and structure the plan to support Five-Year Master Plan expectations under Prop 2.

Board communication and living data

Clear board and community materials, backed by editable data and an Interactive FMP the district owns and keeps current as projects are completed.

Aerial view of a California school campus

Aerial Facility Intelligence

Vantage points a walk-through can’t reach

In the master plan, aerial views show how buildings, fields, parking, circulation and open space relate across each campus. That context helps the district and board see why a project matters and where it fits, and it supports phasing and prioritization decisions.

  • Roof and envelope conditions
  • Drainage patterns and ponding
  • Hardscape, fields and inaccessible areas
  • Site circulation and campus context

Flights are planned around school schedules and flown by FAA-certified remote pilots. Aerial data supports professional assessment; it does not replace it.

How we work

Assess. Align. Advance.

  1. 01

    Assess

    Build the districtwide inventory. Gather condition, enrollment, capacity and educational adequacy data for every site.

  2. 02

    Align

    Work with leadership, staff and stakeholders to set goals, planning standards and the criteria that will guide priorities.

  3. 03

    Prioritize

    Turn needs into defined projects. Rank them against the agreed criteria and build the 15-year capital forecast.

  4. 04

    Fund

    Match projects to realistic local and state funding sources and model scenarios the board can compare.

  5. 05

    Deliver

    Present the plan for adoption and set out an implementation sequence the district can act on right away.

  6. 06

    Update

    Keep the data current through the Interactive FMP, so the plan reflects completed projects, new conditions and new enrollment.

Deliverables

What your district keeps

  • Adopted districtwide Facilities Master Plan document
  • Site-by-site profiles covering condition, capacity and educational adequacy
  • Prioritized project list with scope and planning-level budgets
  • 15-year deferred maintenance and capital needs forecast
  • Funding strategy aligned with local sources and Prop 2 / Five-Year Master Plan expectations
  • Board and community presentation materials
  • Editable, district-owned data set in open formats
  • Interactive FMP: a living, district-owned facilities profile that updates as work is completed

FAQ

Questions districts ask us

A Facilities Master Plan (FMP) is a districtwide roadmap for school facilities. It documents what the district has, what condition it is in, what students and programs need, and which projects should come first. A good FMP also shows how those projects can be funded.

Let’s compare approaches

Want a second perspective before you decide? We’ll talk through your facilities needs, options, and how we would approach the work, with no sales presentation required.

Give us 10 minutes

Tell us what you’re working on.

What are you planning?

Give us 10 minutes. Let’s compare approaches.

Tell us where your facilities stand and what your board is asking. We’ll share how districts like yours are approaching it. No pitch deck, no obligation.